Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

EMA Is Not All You Need: Mapping the Boundary Between Structure and Content in Recurrent Context

What exactly do efficient sequence models gain over simple temporal averaging? We use exponential moving average (EMA) traces, the simplest recurrent context (no gating, no content-based retrieval), as a controlled probe to map the boundary between what fixed-coefficient accumulation can and cannot represent. EMA traces encode temporal structure: a Hebbian architecture with multi-timescale traces achieves 96% of a supervised BiGRU on grammatical role assignment with zero labels, surpassing the supervised model on structure-dependent roles. EMA traces destroy token identity: a 130M-parameter language model using only EMA context reaches C4 perplexity 260 (8x GPT-2), and a predictor ablatio...

AuthorsArth Singh
Primary categorycs.CL
Published17 March 2026
Last updated at source17 March 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b40a6d7e-296e-4777-8926-008a4a1820eb" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.