Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Beyond Accuracy: Diagnosing Algebraic Reasoning Failures in LLMs Across Nine Complexity Dimensions

Algebraic reasoning remains one of the most informative stress tests for large language models, yet current benchmarks provide no mechanism for attributing failure to a specific cause. When a model fails an algebraic problem, a single accuracy score cannot reveal whether the expression was too deeply nested, the operator too uncommon, the intermediate state count too high, or the dependency chain too long. Prior work has studied individual failure modes in isolation, but no framework has varied each complexity factor independently under strict experimental control. No prior system has offered automatic generation and verification of problems of increasing complexity to track model progres...

AuthorsParth Patil, Dhruv Kumar, Yash Sinha et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published8 April 2026
Last updated at source8 April 2026
cs.CLcs.CY
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9cfb6eea-00e2-4407-8b97-211136cd99d6" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.