Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Fine-grained Approaches for Confidence Calibration of LLMs in Automated Code Revision

In today's AI-assisted software engineering landscape, developers increasingly depend on LLMs that are highly capable, yet inherently imperfect. The tendency of these models to produce incorrect outputs can reduce developer productivity. To this end, a canonical mitigation method is to provide calibrated confidence scores that faithfully reflect their likelihood of correctness at the instance-level. Such information allows users to make immediate decisions regarding output acceptance, abstain error-prone outputs, and better align their expectations with the model's capabilities. Since post-trained LLMs do not inherently produce well-calibrated confidence scores, researchers have developed...

AuthorsHong Yi Lin, Chunhua Liu, Haoyu Gao et al.
Primary categorycs.SE
Published8 April 2026
Last updated at source15 September 2026
cs.SEcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/edc2ab2e-0dce-40ec-a175-4f70df916310" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.