Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data for Recommender Systems

In recommender systems, collecting, storing, and processing large-scale interaction data is increasingly costly in terms of time, energy, and computation, yet it remains unclear when additional data stops providing meaningful gains. This paper investigates how offline recommendation performance evolves as the size of the training dataset increases and whether a saturation point can be observed. We implemented a reproducible Python evaluation workflow with two established toolkits, LensKit and RecBole, included 11 large public datasets with at least 7 million interactions, and evaluated 10 tool-algorithm combinations. Using absolute stratified user sampling, we trained models on nine sampl...

AuthorsYoussef Abdou
Primary categorycs.IR
Published7 April 2026
Last updated at source9 April 2026
cs.IRcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b51c6531-6a5d-4440-a079-b3eb023d007f" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.