Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Geometric Limits of Knowledge Distillation: A Minimum-Width Theorem via Superposition Theory

Knowledge distillation compresses large teachers into smaller students, but performance saturates at a loss floor that persists across training methods and objectives. We argue this floor is geometric: neural networks represent far more features than dimensions through superposition, and a student of width $d_S$ can encode at most $d_S \cdot g(α)$ features, where $g(α) = 1/((1-α)\ln\frac{1}{1-α})$ is a sparsity-dependent capacity function. Features beyond this budget are permanently lost, yielding an importance-weighted loss floor. We validate on a toy model (48 configurations, median accuracy >93%) and on Pythia-410M, where sparse autoencoders measure $F \approx 28{,}700$ features at $α\...

AuthorsNilesh Sarkar, Dawar Jyoti Deka
Primary categorycs.LG
Published5 April 2026
Last updated at source7 April 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e004d004-7940-4afe-ba6f-8ef2ea4941ce" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.