Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Choosing the Right Regularizer for Applied ML: Simulation Benchmarks of Popular Scikit-learn Regularization Frameworks

This study surveys the historical development of regularization, tracing its evolution from stepwise regression in the 1960s to recent advancements in formal error control, structured penalties for non-independent features, Bayesian methods, and l0-based regularization (among other techniques). We empirically evaluate the performance of four canonical frameworks -- Ridge, Lasso, ElasticNet, and Post-Lasso OLS -- across 134,400 simulations spanning a 7-dimensional manifold grounded in eight production-grade machine learning models. Our findings demonstrate that for prediction accuracy when the sample-to-feature ratio is sufficient (n/p >= 78), Ridge, Lasso, and ElasticNet are nearly interc...

AuthorsBenjamin S. Knight, Ahsaas Bajaj
Primary categorycs.LG
Published4 April 2026
Last updated at source7 April 2026
cs.LGstat.ML
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ce7a09e5-e0fa-46d1-922f-95d834dc18ca" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.