Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Robust LLM Performance Certification via Constrained Maximum Likelihood Estimation

The ability to rigorously estimate the failure rates of large language models (LLMs) is a prerequisite for their safe deployment. Currently, however, practitioners often face a tradeoff between expensive human gold standards and potentially severely-biased automatic annotation schemes such as "LLM-as-a-Judge" labeling. In this paper, we propose a new, practical, and efficient approach to LLM failure rate estimation based on constrained maximum-likelihood estimation (MLE). Our method integrates three distinct signal sources: (i) a small, high-quality human-labeled calibration set, (ii) a large corpus of LLM-judge annotations, and, most importantly, (iii) additional side information via dom...

AuthorsMinghe Shen, Ananth Balashankar, Adam Fisch et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published11 March 2026
Last updated at source11 March 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/9e553bf2-b22d-4da6-8733-6e873ec12ead" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.