Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

An Inspectable LLM Council for Multi-Model Research Answer Aggregation

Long-form research questions often require answers that combine complementary details, reconcile conflicting estimates, and retain qualifications across several large language model (LLM) outputs. We present an inspectable LLM Council with two synthesis stages: an analyst organizes three independent candidate answers into a structured textual state, and a separately invoked writer composes the final response from the question and that state. We evaluate the workflow on 100 closed-book tasks from the Deep Research Accuracy, Completeness, and Objectivity (DRACO) benchmark, retaining 600 final answers, 100 analyst states, and 720 whole-answer judgments. Under the primary rubric judge, Counci...

AuthorsShuai Wu, Xue Li, Yanna Feng et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published3 April 2026
Last updated at source5 October 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e0ba7a09-e39c-407c-af60-2e0ba6104d1b" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.