Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Explorable Proofs: Making Written Proofs Explorable by Grounding Them in Formal Representations

LLM-generated explanations can make technical content more accessible, but there is a ceiling on what they can support interactively. Because LLM outputs are static text, they cannot be executed or stepped through. We argue that grounding explanations in a formalized representation enables interactive affordances beyond what static text supports. We instantiate this idea for mathematical proof comprehension with explorable theorems, a system that uses LLMs to translate a theorem and its written proof into Lean, a programming language for machine-checked proofs, and links the written proof with the Lean code. Readers can work through the proof at a step-level granularity, test custom examp...

AuthorsHita Kambhamettu, Will Crichton, Sean Welleck et al.
Primary categorycs.HC
Published3 April 2026
Last updated at source14 October 2026
cs.HCcs.AIcs.PL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d7383714-a10d-4ec3-a38c-6f5c5a4bbf1c" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.