Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Jump Start or False Start? A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of LLM-initialized Bandits

The recent advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) offers new opportunities to generate user preference data to warm-start bandits. Recent studies on contextual bandits with LLM initialization (CBLI) have shown that these synthetic priors can significantly lower early regret. However, these findings assume that LLM-generated choices are reasonably aligned with actual user preferences. In this paper, we systematically examine how LLM-generated preferences perform when random and label-flipping noise is injected into the synthetic training data. For aligned domains, we find that warm-starting remains effective up to 30% corruption, loses its advantage around 40%, and degrades performanc...

AuthorsAdam Bayley, Xiaodan Zhu, Raquel Aoki et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published2 April 2026
Last updated at source2 April 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/86379241-17c8-46f6-833a-ea0e6d06cdc2" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.