Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Conformal Risk Control under Non-Monotone Losses: Theory and Finite-Sample Guarantees

Conformal risk control (CRC) provides distribution-free guarantees for controlling the expected loss at a user-specified level. Existing theory typically assumes that the loss decreases monotonically with a tuning parameter that governs the size of the prediction set. However, this assumption is often violated in practice, where losses may behave non-monotonically due to competing objectives such as coverage and efficiency. In this paper, we study CRC under non-monotone loss functions when the tuning parameter is selected from a finite grid, a setting commonly arising in thresholding and discretized decision rules. Revisiting a known counterexample, we show that the validity of CRC withou...

AuthorsTareq Aldirawi, Yun Li, Wenge Guo
Primary categorystat.ML
Published2 April 2026
Last updated at source17 April 2026
stat.MLcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/dfb7666d-1c41-456f-b12b-86022fbcc61d" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.