Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Wired for Overconfidence: A Mechanistic Perspective on Inflated Verbalized Confidence in LLMs

Large language models are often not just wrong, but \emph{confidently wrong}: when they produce factually incorrect answers, they tend to verbalize overly high confidence rather than signal uncertainty. Such verbalized overconfidence can mislead users and weaken confidence scores as a reliable uncertainty signal, yet its internal mechanisms remain poorly understood. We present a circuit-level mechanistic analysis of this inflated verbalized confidence in LLMs, organized around three axes: capturing verbalized confidence as a differentiable internal signal, identifying the circuits that causally inflate it, and leveraging these insights for targeted inference-time recalibration. Across two...

AuthorsTianyi Zhao, Yinhan He, Wendy Zheng et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published1 April 2026
Last updated at source27 July 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b89cc55b-0a5c-4f13-aaa6-2b1ddf33f3c5" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.