Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Adversarial Moral Stress Testing of Large Language Models

Evaluating the ethical robustness of large language models (LLMs) deployed in software systems remains challenging, particularly under sustained adversarial user interaction. Existing safety benchmarks typically rely on single-round evaluations and aggregate metrics, such as toxicity scores and refusal rates, which offer limited visibility into behavioral instability that may arise during realistic multi-turn interactions. As a result, rare but high-impact ethical failures and progressive degradation effects may remain undetected prior to deployment. This paper introduces Adversarial Moral Stress Testing (AMST), a stress-based evaluation framework for assessing ethical robustness under ad...

AuthorsSaeid Jamshidi, Foutse Khomh, Arghavan Moradi Dakhel et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published1 April 2026
Last updated at source1 April 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/86a0b2a7-289c-4946-ade5-b058e55776b7" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.