Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

When Users Change Their Mind: Evaluating Interruptible Agents in Long-Horizon Web Navigation

As LLM agents transition from short, static problem solving to executing complex, long-horizon tasks in dynamic environments, the ability to handle user interruptions, such as adding requirement or revising goals, during mid-task execution is becoming a core requirement for realistic deployment. However, existing benchmarks largely assume uninterrupted agent behavior or study interruptions only in short, unconstrained language tasks. In this paper, we present the first systematic study of interruptible agents in long-horizon, environmentally grounded web navigation tasks, where actions induce persistent state changes. We formalize three realistic interruption types, including addition, re...

AuthorsHenry Peng Zou, Chunyu Miao, Wei-Chieh Huang et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published1 April 2026
Last updated at source1 April 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/bf9a063a-900f-45fc-b20e-097bc583615d" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.