Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

A Japanese Benchmark for Evaluating Social Bias in Reasoning Based on Attribution Theory

In enhancing the fairness of Large Language Models (LLMs), evaluating social biases rooted in the cultural contexts of specific linguistic regions is essential. However, most existing Japanese benchmarks heavily rely on translating English data, which does not necessarily provide an evaluation suitable for Japanese culture. Furthermore, they only evaluate bias in the conclusion, failing to capture biases lurking in the reasoning. In this study, based on attribution theory in social psychology, we constructed a new dataset, ``JUBAKU-v2,'' which evaluates the bias in attributing behaviors to in-groups and out-groups within reasoning while fixing the conclusion. This dataset consists of 216 ...

AuthorsTaihei Shiotani, Masahiro Kaneko, Naoaki Okazaki
Primary categorycs.CL
Published1 April 2026
Last updated at source1 April 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ee16fa35-784c-49fa-b6ce-4cdec64bc3ce" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.