Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Emergence WebVoyager: Toward Consistent and Transparent Evaluation of (Web) Agents in The Wild

Reliable evaluation of AI agents operating in complex, real-world environments requires methodologies that are robust, transparent, and contextually aligned with the tasks agents are intended to perform. This study identifies persistent shortcomings in existing AI agent evaluation practices that are particularly acute in web agent evaluation, as exemplified by our audit of WebVoyager, including task-framing ambiguity and operational variability that hinder meaningful and reproducible performance comparisons. To address these challenges, we introduce Emergence WebVoyager, an enhanced version of the WebVoyager benchmark that standardizes evaluation methodology through clear guidelines for t...

AuthorsDeepak Akkil, Mowafak Allaham, Amal Raj et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published30 March 2026
Last updated at source30 March 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/fe75425a-6461-4309-a836-b7a0ce3625fe" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.