Shapley meets Rawls: an integrated framework for measuring and explaining unfairness
Explainability and fairness have mainly been considered separately, with recent exceptions trying the explain the sources of unfairness. This paper shows that the Shapley value can be used to both define and explain unfairness, under standard group fairness criteria. This offers an integrated framework to estimate and derive inference on unfairness as-well-as the features that contribute to it. Our framework can also be extended from Shapley values to the family of Efficient-Symmetric-Linear (ESL) values, some of which offer more robust definitions of fairness, and shorter computation times. An illustration is run on the Census Income dataset from the UCI Machine Learning Repository. Our ...
| Authors | Fadoua Amri-Jouidel, Emmanuel Kemel, Stéphane Mussard |
|---|---|
| Primary category | cs.LG |
| Published | 27 March 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 30 March 2026 |
Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.