Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Preference-Aligned LoRA Merging: Preserving Subspace Coverage and Addressing Directional Anisotropy

Merging multiple Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) modules is promising for constructing general-purpose systems, yet challenging because LoRA update directions span different subspaces and contribute unevenly. When merged naively, such mismatches can weaken the directions most critical to certain task losses while overemphasizing relatively less important ones, ultimately reducing the model's ability to represent all tasks faithfully. We revisit this problem through two perspectives: subspace coverage, which captures how broadly LoRA directions cover diverse representational directions, and anisotropy, which reflects the imbalance of influence across those directions. We propose TARA-Merging (T...

AuthorsWooseong Jeong, Wonyoung Lee, Kuk-Jin Yoon
Primary categorycs.CV
Published27 March 2026
Last updated at source27 March 2026
cs.CVcs.AIcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d898f232-4493-4de1-a042-2314ef5acd78" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.