Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

SWE-PRBench: Benchmarking AI Code Review Quality Against Pull Request Feedback

We introduce SWE-PRBench, a benchmark of 350 pull requests with human-annotated ground truth for evaluating AI code review quality. Evaluated against an LLM-as-judge framework validated at kappa=0.75, 8 frontier models detect only 15-31% of human-flagged issues on the diff-only configuration, demonstrating that AI code review remains far below human expert performance despite strong results on code generation benchmarks. Pull requests are drawn from active open-source repositories, filtered from 700 candidates using a Repository Quality Score, and evaluated under three frozen context configurations: diff only (config_A), diff with file content (config_B), and full context (config_C), enab...

AuthorsDeepak Kumar
Primary categorycs.SE
Published27 March 2026
Last updated at source27 March 2026
cs.SEcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a11309fa-5474-4347-a31c-cda359d2b063" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Models and datasets referencing this paper

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.