Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Humans vs Vision-Language Models: A Unified Measure of Narrative Coherence

We study narrative coherence in visually grounded stories by comparing human-written narratives with those generated by vision-language models (VLMs) on the Visual Writing Prompts corpus. Using a set of metrics that capture different aspects of narrative coherence, including coreference, discourse relation types, topic continuity, character persistence, and multimodal character grounding, we compute a narrative coherence score. We find that VLMs show broadly similar coherence profiles that differ systematically from those of humans. In addition, differences for individual measures are often subtle, but they become clearer when considered jointly. Overall, our results indicate that, despit...

AuthorsNikolai Ilinykh, Hyewon Jang, Shalom Lappin et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published26 March 2026
Last updated at source26 March 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/fd9c101d-15e5-4041-ac58-46abc905822c" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.