Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Demystifying When Pruning Works via Representation Hierarchies

Network pruning, which removes less important parameters or architectures, is often expected to improve efficiency while preserving performance. However, this expectation does not consistently hold across language tasks: pruned models can perform well on non-generative tasks but frequently fail in generative settings. To understand this discrepancy, we analyze network pruning from a representation-hierarchy perspective, decomposing the internal computation of language models into three sequential spaces: embedding (hidden representations), logit (pre-softmax outputs), and probability (post-softmax distributions). We find that representations in the embedding and logit spaces are largely r...

AuthorsShwai He, Guoheng Sun, Haichao Zhang et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published25 March 2026
Last updated at source11 May 2026
cs.CLcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ca416749-eb06-44d6-8592-dd05e409d2a1" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.