Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Bridging the Evaluation Gap: Standardized Benchmarks for Multi-Objective Search

Empirical evaluation in multi-objective search (MOS) has historically suffered from fragmentation, relying on heterogeneous problem instances with incompatible objective definitions that make cross-study comparisons difficult. This standardization gap is further exacerbated by the realization that DIMACS road networks, a historical default benchmark for the field, exhibit highly correlated objectives that fail to capture diverse Pareto-front structures. To address this, we introduce the first comprehensive, standardized benchmark suite for exact and approximate MOS. Our suite spans four structurally diverse domains: real-world road networks, structured synthetic graphs, game-based grid en...

AuthorsHadar Peer, Carlos Hernandez, Sven Koenig et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published25 March 2026
Last updated at source9 August 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f2ba6985-bf79-4ee3-92cc-e0cf6b9005e1" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.