Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

On the Context Sensitivity of LLM Moral Judgment

A human's moral decision depends heavily on the context. Yet research on LLM morality has largely studied fixed scenarios. We address this gap by introducing Contextual MoralChoice, a dataset of moral dilemmas with systematic contextual variations known from moral psychology to shift human judgment: consequentialist, emotional, and relational. Evaluating 22 LLMs, we find that nearly all models are context-sensitive, shifting their judgments towards rule-violating behavior. Comparing with a human survey, we find that models and humans are most triggered by different contextual variations, and that a model aligned with human judgments in the base case is not necessarily aligned in its conte...

AuthorsAdrian Sauter, Mona Schirmer
Primary categorycs.AI
Published24 March 2026
Last updated at source8 September 2026
cs.AIcs.CLcs.CYcs.HC
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/dabe677e-88a0-4099-8be5-52e57ba1b600" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.