Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Conformal Risk Control for Safety-Critical Wildfire Evacuation Mapping: A Comparative Study of Tabular, Spatial, and Graph-Based Models

Every wildfire prediction model deployed today shares a dangerous property: none of these methods provides formal guarantees on how much fire spread is missed. Despite extensive work on wildfire spread prediction using deep learning, no prior study has applied distribution-free safety guarantees to this domain, leaving evacuation planners reliant on probability thresholds with no formal assurance. We address this gap by presenting, to our knowledge, the first application of conformal risk control (CRC) to wildfire spread prediction, providing finite-sample guarantees on false negative rate (FNR <= 0.05). We expose a stark failure: across three model families of increasing complexity (tabu...

AuthorsBaljinnyam Dayan
Primary categorycs.LG
Published20 March 2026
Last updated at source20 March 2026
cs.LGcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/8be0c3c9-8f5c-443f-9c01-b6adddd20e28" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.