Evaluating Large Language Models' Responses to Sexual and Reproductive Health Queries in Nepali
As Large Language Models (LLMs) become integrated into daily life, they are increasingly used for personal queries, including Sexual and Reproductive Health (SRH), allowing users to chat anonymously without fear of judgment. However, current evaluation methods primarily focus on accuracy, often for objective queries in high-resource languages, and lack criteria to assess usability and safety, especially for low-resource languages and culturally sensitive domains like SRH. This paper introduces LLM Evaluation Framework (LEAF), that conducts assessments across multiple criteria: accuracy, language, usability gaps (including relevance, adequacy, and cultural appropriateness), and safety gaps...
| Authors | Medha Sharma, Supriya Khadka, Udit Chandra Aryal et al. |
|---|---|
| Primary category | cs.CL |
| Published | 4 March 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 4 March 2026 |
Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.