Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Calibeating Made Simple

We study calibeating, the problem of post-processing external forecasts online to minimize cumulative losses and match an informativeness-based benchmark. Unlike prior work, which analyzed calibeating for specific losses with specific arguments, we reduce calibeating to existing online learning techniques and obtain results for general proper losses. More concretely, we first show that calibeating is minimax-equivalent to regret minimization. This recovers the $O(\log T)$ calibeating rate of Foster and Hart [FH23] for the Brier and log losses and its optimality, and yields new optimal calibeating rates for mixable losses and general bounded losses. Second, we prove that multi-calibeating ...

AuthorsYurong Chen, Zhiyi Huang, Michael I. Jordan et al.
Primary categorycs.LG
Published23 March 2026
Last updated at source23 March 2026
cs.LGcs.AIcs.GTecon.TH
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/80130d64-a805-4ed1-a618-b867b2aa5c4f" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.