Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Behavioural feasible set: Value alignment constraints on AI decision support

When organisations adopt commercial AI systems for decision support, they inherit value judgements embedded by vendors that are neither transparent nor renegotiable. The governance puzzle is not whether AI can support decisions but which recommendations the system can actually produce given how its vendor has configured it. I formalise this as a behavioural feasible set, the range of recommendations reachable under vendor-imposed alignment constraints, and characterise diagnostic thresholds for when organisational requirements exceed the system's flexibility. In scenario-based experiments using binary decision scenarios and multi-stakeholder ranking tasks, I show that alignment materially...

AuthorsTaejin Park
Primary categorycs.AI
Published22 March 2026
Last updated at source22 March 2026
cs.AIecon.GN
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/dff760a1-6f31-4727-9bee-bc2fc46ff0a7" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.