Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Measuring Weak-to-Strong Legibility of Reasoning Models

Reasoning language models (RLMs) and the intermediate chains of thought they emit play an increasingly central role in multi-agent setups such as inter-model monitoring or distillation into smaller models. When agents at different capability tiers must cooperate, strong models need to produce traces digestible by weaker ones. We refer to this goal as "weak-to-strong legibility". Trustworthiness of large models depends in part on this legibility property. For safety oversight in particular, adoption of weak monitors may become a standard for reliability scaffolds on a healthy budget. Legibility requires that the shape of these decision-making traces takes some form accessible to weaker mon...

AuthorsDani Roytburg, Shreya Sridhar, Daphne Ippolito
Primary categorycs.MA
Published20 March 2026
Last updated at source2 June 2026
cs.MAcs.AIcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/978d1011-877f-4e35-a68d-2fc064c8d165" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.