Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Rolling-Origin Validation Reverses Model Rankings in Multi-Step PM10 Forecasting: XGBoost, SARIMA, and Persistence

(a) Many air quality forecasting studies report gains from machine learning, but evaluations often use static chronological splits and omit persistence baselines, so the operational added value under routine updating is unclear. (b) Using 2,350 daily PM10 observations from 2017 to 2024 at an urban background monitoring station in southern Europe, we compare XGBoost and SARIMA against persistence under a static split and a rolling-origin protocol with monthly updates. We report horizon-specific skill and the predictability horizon, defined as the maximum horizon with positive persistence-relative skill. Static evaluation suggests XGBoost performs well from one to seven days ahead, but roll...

AuthorsFederico Garcia Crespi, Eduardo Yubero Funes, Marina Alfosea Simon
Primary categorycs.LG
Published19 March 2026
Last updated at source19 March 2026
cs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a31c7ce7-1c08-4da9-9714-6575cba61094" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.