Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

On the Ability of Transformers to Verify Plans

Transformers have shown inconsistent success in AI planning tasks, and theoretical understanding of when generalization should be expected has been limited. We take important steps towards addressing this gap by analyzing the ability of decoder-only models to verify whether a given plan correctly solves a given planning instance. To analyse the general setting where the number of objects -- and thus the effective input alphabet -- grows at test time, we introduce C*-RASP, an extension of C-RASP designed to establish length generalization guarantees for transformers under the simultaneous growth in sequence length and vocabulary size. Our results identify a large class of classical plannin...

AuthorsYash Sarrof, Yupei Du, Katharina Stein et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published20 March 2026
Last updated at source3 July 2026
cs.AIcs.CLcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b7da3bdd-0f6f-4905-8be9-697831963d40" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.