Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

EvidenceRL: Reinforcing Evidence Consistency for Trustworthy Language Models

Large Language Models (LLMs) are fluent but prone to hallucinations, producing answers that appear plausible yet are unsupported by available evidence. This failure is especially problematic in high-stakes domains where decisions must be justified by verifiable information. We introduce \textbf{EvidenceRL}, a reinforcement learning framework that enforces evidence adherence during training. EvidenceRL scores candidate responses for grounding (entailment with retrieved evidence and context) and correctness (agreement with reference answers) and optimizes the generator using Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO). We evaluate across two high-stakes domains, cardiac diagnosis and legal re...

AuthorsJ. Ben Tamo, Yuxing Lu, Benoit L. Marteau et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published20 March 2026
Last updated at source20 March 2026
cs.CLcs.IRcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ec60a246-9ad1-4bb9-9858-36b1fcc11aba" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.