Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Auditing Preferences for Brands and Cultures in LLMs

Large language models (LLMs) based AI systems increasingly mediate what billions of people see, choose and buy. This creates an urgent need to quantify the systemic risks of LLM-driven market intermediation, including its implications for market fairness, competition, and the diversity of information exposure. This paper introduces ChoiceEval, a reproducible framework for auditing preferences for brands and cultures in large language models (LLMs) under realistic usage conditions. ChoiceEval addresses two core technical challenges: (i) generating realistic, persona-diverse evaluation queries and (ii) converting free-form outputs into comparable choice sets and quantitative preference metr...

AuthorsJasmine Rienecker, Katarina Mpofu, Naman Goel et al.
Primary categorycs.HC
Published18 March 2026
Last updated at source18 March 2026
cs.HCcs.AIcs.CYcs.IRcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/af913d35-00c6-4bb8-832c-a878022fa91b" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.