Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Argument Reconstruction as Supervision for Critical Thinking in LLMs

To think critically about arguments, human learners are trained to identify, reconstruct, and evaluate arguments. Argument reconstruction is especially important because it makes an argument's underlying inferences explicit. However, it remains unclear whether LLMs can similarly enhance their critical thinking ability by learning to reconstruct arguments. To address this question, we introduce a holistic framework with three contributions. We (1) propose an engine that automatically reconstructs arbitrary arguments (GAAR), (2) synthesize a new high-quality argument reconstruction dataset (Arguinas) using the GAAR engine, and (3) investigate whether learning argument reconstruction benefit...

AuthorsHyun Ryu, Gyouk Chu, Gregor Betz et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published18 March 2026
Last updated at source14 May 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/754980f5-3d5d-4742-a143-d871c64a8ab6" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.