Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Catching rationalization in the act: detecting motivated reasoning before and after CoT via activation probing

Large language models (LLMs) can produce chains of thought (CoT) that do not accurately reflect the actual factors driving their answers. In multiple-choice settings with an injected hint favoring a particular option, models may shift their final answer toward the hinted option and produce a CoT that rationalizes the response without acknowledging the hint - an instance of motivated reasoning. We study this phenomenon across multiple LLM families and datasets demonstrating that motivated reasoning can be identified by probing internal activations even in cases when it cannot be easily determined from CoT. Using supervised probes trained on the model's residual stream, we show that (i) pre...

AuthorsParsa Mirtaheri, Mikhail Belkin
Primary categorycs.LG
Published17 March 2026
Last updated at source17 March 2026
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f563c1c2-3ece-4901-898a-59e27cf85d30" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.