Omanic: Towards Step-wise Evaluation of Multi-hop Reasoning in Large Language Models
Evaluating the reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs) solely from final answers can obscure failures in intermediate steps, especially in multi-hop QA benchmarks without step-level annotations. To address this gap, we introduce Omanic, an open-domain 4-hop QA benchmark designed not only to measure final-answer accuracy but also to diagnose where reasoning breaks down. Omanic contains 10,296 machine-generated training examples (OmanicSynth) and 967 expert-reviewed human-annotated evaluation examples (OmanicBench), with each evaluation question decomposed into single-hop sub-questions, intermediate answers, and structured graph topologies. Experiments with proprietary and open-...
| Authors | Xiaojie Gu, Sherry T. Tong, Aosong Feng et al. |
|---|---|
| Primary category | cs.CL |
| Published | 17 March 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 25 August 2026 |
Connected in the knowledge graph
- li-lab/OmanicDataset · cited by
Models and datasets referencing this paper
- li-lab/OmanicDataset
Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.