Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Mitigating Overthinking in Large Reasoning Language Models via Reasoning Path Deviation Monitoring

Large Reasoning Language Models (LRLMs) demonstrate impressive capabilities on complex tasks by utilizing long Chain-of-Thought reasoning. However, they are prone to overthinking, which generates redundant reasoning steps that degrade both performance and efficiency. Recently, early-exit strategies are proposed to mitigate overthinking by dynamically and adaptively terminating redundant reasoning. However, current early-exit methods either introduce extra training overhead by relying on proxy models or limit inference throughput due to the frequent content switching between reasoning and generating probing answers. Moreover, most early-exit methods harm LRLMs performance due to over-trunc...

AuthorsWeixin Guan, Liang Li, Jiapeng Liu et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published15 March 2026
Last updated at source15 March 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ab2b1fdf-a461-44c8-8689-0af328e9be7e" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.