Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Interpreting Negation in GPT-2: Layer- and Head-Level Causal Analysis

Negation remains a persistent challenge for modern language models, often causing reversed meanings or factual errors. In this work, we conduct a causal analysis of how GPT-2 Small internally processes such linguistic transformations. We examine its hidden representations at both the layer and head level. Our analysis is based on a self-curated 12,000-pair dataset of matched affirmative and negated sentences, covering multiple linguistic templates and forms of negation. To quantify this behavior, we define a metric, the Negation Effect Score (NES), which measures the model's sensitivity in distinguishing between affirmative statements and their negations. We carried out two key interventi...

AuthorsAbdullah Al Mofael, Lisa M. Kuhn, Ghassan Alkadi et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published12 March 2026
Last updated at source12 March 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ca4539df-2b88-4771-83aa-693a8dffb2ab" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.