Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Human-Centred LLM Privacy Audits: Findings and Frictions

Large language models (LLMs) learn statistical associations from massive training corpora and user interactions, and deployed systems can surface or infer information about individuals. Yet people lack practical ways to inspect what a model associates with their name. We report interim findings from an ongoing study and introduce LMP2, a browser-based self-audit tool. In two user studies ($N_{total}{=}458$), GPT-4o predicts 11 of 50 features for everyday people with $\ge$60\% accuracy, and participants report wanting control over LLM-generated associations despite not considering all outputs privacy violations. To validate our probing method, we evaluate eight LLMs on public figures and n...

AuthorsDimitri Staufer, Kirsten Morehouse, David Hartmann et al.
Primary categorycs.HC
Published12 March 2026
Last updated at source12 March 2026
cs.HCcs.AIcs.CLcs.CY
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e5170b19-89f5-4ad7-a5c3-d435b6bc122c" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.