Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

LLM-Assisted Causal Structure Disambiguation and Factor Extraction for Legal Judgment Prediction

Mainstream methods for Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) based on Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) heavily rely on the statistical correlation between case facts and judgment results. This paradigm lacks explicit modeling of legal constituent elements and underlying causal logic, making models prone to learning spurious correlations and suffering from poor robustness. While introducing causal inference can mitigate this issue, existing causal LJP methods face two critical bottlenecks in real-world legal texts: inaccurate legal factor extraction with severe noise, and significant uncertainty in causal structure discovery due to Markov equivalence under sparse features. To address these cha...

AuthorsYuzhi Liang, Lixiang Ma, Xinrong Zhu
Primary categorycs.CL
Published12 March 2026
Last updated at source12 March 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/a3f9757f-7c88-4ba9-b455-fd68a1e13b0e" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.