Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Deactivating Refusal Triggers: Understanding and Mitigating Overrefusal in Safety Alignment

Safety alignment aims to ensure that large language models (LLMs) refuse harmful requests by post-training on harmful queries paired with refusal answers. Although safety alignment is widely adopted in industry, the overrefusal problem where aligned LLMs also reject benign queries after safety alignment post-training, remains insufficiently studied. Such an issue degrades the usability of safety alignment in real-world applications. In this paper, we examine how overrefusal arises under safety alignment, and propose a mitigation strategy inspired by our findings. We define refusal triggers as linguistic cues in the training data that elicit refusal responses, safety alignment encourages L...

AuthorsZhiyu Xue, Zimo Qi, Guangliang Liu et al.
Primary categorycs.AI
Published12 March 2026
Last updated at source12 March 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/f91f01e3-9b51-47cf-8c93-7d5a2d456842" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.