Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Procedural Fairness via Group Counterfactual Explanation

Fairness in machine learning research has largely focused on outcome-oriented fairness criteria such as Equalized Odds, while comparatively less attention has been given to procedural-oriented fairness, which addresses how a model arrives at its predictions. Neglecting procedural fairness means it is possible for a model to generate different explanations for different protected groups, thereby eroding trust. In this work, we introduce Group Counterfactual Integrated Gradients (GCIG), an in-processing regularization framework that enforces explanation invariance across groups, conditioned on the true label. For each input, GCIG computes explanations relative to multiple Group Conditional ...

AuthorsGideon Popoola, John Sheppard
Primary categorycs.LG
Published11 March 2026
Last updated at source11 March 2026
cs.LGcs.AIcs.CY
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/fc741cf5-bcd3-4e2a-9707-8602a831b9e0" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.