Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

On the Reliability of Cue Conflict and Beyond

Understanding how neural networks rely on visual cues offers a human-interpretable view of their internal decision processes. The cue-conflict benchmark has been influential in probing shape-texture preference and in motivating the insight that stronger, human-like shape bias is often associated with improved in-domain performance. However, we find that the current stylization-based instantiation can yield unstable and ambiguous bias estimates. Specifically, stylization may not reliably instantiate perceptually valid and separable cues nor control their relative informativeness, ratio-based bias can obscure absolute cue sensitivity, and restricting evaluation to preselected classes can di...

AuthorsPum Jun Kim, Seung-Ah Lee, Seongho Park et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published11 March 2026
Last updated at source1 July 2026
cs.CVcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/ce59fa5b-2a58-47e3-9f5d-b9d13fbe7a9a" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.