Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Learning to Negotiate: Multi-Agent Deliberation for Collective Value Alignment in LLMs

LLM alignment has progressed in single-agent settings through paradigms such as RL with human feedback (RLHF), while recent work explores scalable alternatives such as RL with AI feedback (RLAIF) and dynamic alignment objectives. However, these approaches remain limited in multi-stakeholder settings, where conflicting values arise and deliberative negotiation is required. This work proposes a multi-agent negotiation-based alignment framework that aligns LLMs to Collective Agency (CA)-an existing alignment objective introduced to promote the continual expansion of agency-while simultaneously improving conflict-resolution capability. To enable scalable training, two self-play LLM instances ...

AuthorsPanatchakorn Anantaprayoon, Nataliia Babina, Nima Asgharbeygi et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published11 March 2026
Last updated at source9 April 2026
cs.CLcs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/7c940b73-ea96-4d21-b421-37cf3361824d" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.