Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Quantifying the Accuracy and Cost Impact of Design Decisions in Budget-Constrained Agentic LLM Search

Agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems combine iterative search, planning prompts, and retrieval backends, but deployed settings impose explicit budgets on tool calls and completion tokens. We present a controlled measurement study of how search depth, retrieval strategy, and completion budget affect accuracy and cost under fixed constraints. Using Budget-Constrained Agentic Search (BCAS), a model-agnostic evaluation harness that surfaces remaining budget and gates tool use, we run comparisons across six LLMs and three question-answering benchmarks. Across models and datasets, accuracy improves with additional searches up to a small cap, hybrid lexical and dense retrieval wi...

AuthorsKyle McCleary, James Ghawaly
Primary categorycs.AI
Published9 March 2026
Last updated at source9 March 2026
cs.AI
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/b42d5aa7-d564-4b32-ac8f-6b8533efbae8" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.