Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Knowing without Acting: The Disentangled Geometry of Safety Mechanisms in Large Language Models

Safety alignment is often conceptualized as a monolithic process wherein harmfulness detection automatically triggers refusal. However, the persistence of jailbreak attacks suggests a fundamental mechanistic decoupling. We propose the \textbf{\underline{D}}isentangled \textbf{\underline{S}}afety \textbf{\underline{H}}ypothesis \textbf{(DSH)}, positing that safety computation operates on two distinct subspaces: a \textit{Recognition Axis} ($\mathbf{v}_H$, ``Knowing'') and an \textit{Execution Axis} ($\mathbf{v}_R$, ``Acting''). Our geometric analysis reveals a universal ``Reflex-to-Dissociation'' evolution, where these signals transition from antagonistic entanglement in early layers to st...

AuthorsJinman Wu, Yi Xie, Shen Lin et al.
Primary categorycs.CR
Published6 March 2026
Last updated at source13 March 2026
cs.CRcs.AIcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/d216dacf-f9d0-4398-9331-a1c0d0f6b3bd" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.