Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

VRM: Teaching Reward Models to Understand Authentic Human Preferences

Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success across diverse natural language tasks, yet the reward models employed for aligning LLMs often encounter challenges of reward hacking, where the approaches predominantly rely on directly mapping prompt-response pairs to scalar scores, which may inadvertently capture spurious correlations rather than authentic human preferences. In contrast, human evaluation employs a sophisticated process that initially weighs the relative importance of multiple high-dimensional objectives according to the prompt context, subsequently evaluating response quality through low-dimensional semantic features such as logical coherence and contextual a...

AuthorsBiao Liu, Ning Xu, Junming Yang et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published5 March 2026
Last updated at source5 March 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/aea2f5e9-1f08-4973-b399-be2c7bc8ea06" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.