Benchmark of Benchmarks: Unpacking Influence and Code Repository Quality in LLM Safety Benchmarks
The rapid expansion of research in LLM safety presents challenges in tracking advancements, making benchmarks important evaluation infrastructures for identifying key trends and facilitating systematic comparisons. Yet no systematic assessment exists of their code quality and runnability, nor of what factors are associated with the community's adoption of certain benchmarks over others. To address this gap, we conduct a systematic measurement study of 31 LLM safety benchmarks (covering prompt injection, jailbreak, and hallucination) with 382 non-benchmark papers as a control group, combining automated static analysis, human runnability testing (220+ person-hours), and bibliometric analysi...
| Authors | Junjie Chu, Xinyue Shen, Ye Leng et al. |
|---|---|
| Primary category | cs.CR |
| Published | 3 March 2026 |
| Last updated at source | 14 May 2026 |
Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.