Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Scalable Evaluation of the Realism of Synthetic Environmental Augmentations in Images

Evaluation of AI systems often requires synthetic test cases, particularly for rare or safety-critical conditions that are difficult to observe in operational data. Generative AI offers a promising approach for producing such data through controllable image editing, but its usefulness depends on whether the resulting images are sufficiently realistic to support meaningful evaluation. We present a scalable framework for assessing the realism of synthetic image-editing methods and apply it to the task of adding environmental conditions-fog, rain, snow, and nighttime-to car-mounted camera images. Using 40 clear-day images, we compare rule-based augmentation libraries with generative AI image...

AuthorsDamian J. Ruck, Paul Vautravers, Oliver Chalkley et al.
Primary categorycs.CV
Published4 March 2026
Last updated at source4 March 2026
cs.CVcs.LG
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/de218564-5f11-45d6-b018-e5e75d640d9f" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.