Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Retrieval or Representation? Reassessing Benchmark Gaps in Multilingual and Visually Rich RAG

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is a common way to ground language models in external documents and up-to-date information. Classical retrieval systems relied on lexical methods such as BM25, which rank documents by term overlap with corpus-level weighting. End-to-end multimodal retrievers trained on large query-document datasets claim substantial improvements over these approaches, especially for multilingual documents with complex visual layouts. We demonstrate that better document representation is the primary driver of benchmark improvements. By systematically varying transcription and preprocessing methods while holding the retrieval mechanism fixed, we demonstrate that BM25 can...

AuthorsMartin Asenov, Kenza Benkirane, Dan Goldwater et al.
Primary categorycs.CL
Published4 March 2026
Last updated at source4 March 2026
cs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/e2da47de-7c77-4be5-8b5b-bdb41947dfe9" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.