Sign inGet started
Paper · arXiv

Code Fingerprints: Disentangled Attribution of LLM-Generated Code

The rapid adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) has transformed modern software development by enabling automated code generation at scale. While these systems improve productivity, they introduce new challenges for software governance, accountability, and compliance. Existing research primarily focuses on distinguishing machine-generated code from human-written code; however, many practical scenarios--such as vulnerability triage, incident investigation, and licensing audits--require identifying which LLM produced a given code snippet. In this paper, we study the problem of model-level code attribution, which aims to determine the source LLM responsible for generated code. Although at...

AuthorsJiaxun Guo, Ziyuan Yang, Mengyu Sun et al.
Primary categorycs.SE
Published4 March 2026
Last updated at source4 March 2026
cs.SEcs.CL
Embed this entry
<iframe src="https://silytics.si/embed/item/964e6674-f34f-4ace-971e-b7b6555b46fd" width="420" height="190" style="border:0" loading="lazy" title="Silytics entry"></iframe>

Free, no tracking. More about feeds and embeds.

Silytics shows public metadata from arXiv and links to the original. Information may be incomplete or out of date. Last refreshed 17 October 2026. Licenses and terms of the original apply to the work itself. Not financial, legal or professional advice.